« Previous Post | Blog Home | Next Post »
Debit card fraud outbreak raises questions about data breach
Posted on Mar 10, 2006 by Tom Fragala
Computerworld is following this big story. The reason it's a big deal isn't just the scope of the fraud which is massive. It's because the fraudsters managed to compromise debit card PIN-based transactions on a huge scale, which seems to imply they cracked the encrypted PIN codes of consumers that are sent with every transaction. PIN-based transactions have generally been considered to be quite safe compared to credit cards. Of course, they're only as safe as the protection of the databases and the encryption methods.
The continued refusal by major credit card associations and financial institutions to identify the source of a data compromise that has resulted in a wave of debit card fraud worldwide is fueling concerns about the scope of the problem.
It is also shining a spotlight on what may be growing attempts by criminal gangs to try to compromise PIN-based card transactions, which have until now been considered extremely secure, analysts said.
The immediate furor was ignited earlier this week by Citibank, which acknowledged that it had put transaction holds on an unspecified number of Citi-branded MasterCard debit cards after detecting fraudulent cash withdrawals in Canada, Russia and the U.K.
In a brief statement, Citibank said that the fraud was the result of a “third-party business information breach” that took place last year. To protect its customers, the company said it “blocked PIN-based transactions in those locations for the customers affected by the breach." A spokesman for the company, however, refused to name the third-party retailer involved in the breach.
Citibank’s disclosure made it the latest in a fast growing list of financial institutions that during the past several weeks have reissued thousands of debit cards or blocked access to certain transactions in countries where ATM cards were used fraudulently to withdraw cash and make purchases on U.S. accounts.
The list includes banks such as Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo Bank and Washington Mutual Bank, as well as numerous credit unions around the country. One example is $13 billion North Carolina State Employees Credit Union in Raleigh, N.C., which over the past two weeks has reissued more than 27,500 debit cards after being told by Visa U.S.A. Inc. of a security breach involving a U.S. retailer.
technorati tags: data+breach, fraud, idtheft, identitytheft
Filed under: Identity Theft



Comments
Pete on Mar 10, 2006
Doesn't Calfornia have a law that compels companies to disclose info about these type of breaches? If so, why doesn't the state force CitiBank and the other banks to release info about these third-party retailers?
Tom Fragala on Mar 10, 2006
Good question. Stop that. :-)
Yes CA privacy laws do require that the customer be notified about the breach. The laws do not require that all the details, such as where the breach came from, be provided.
Post a Comment